Filed under: Uncategorized
B.B.C.:
An appeal judge in Australia has ruled that an animation depicting well-known cartoon characters engaging in sexual acts is child pornography.
The internet cartoon featured characters from the Simpsons TV series.
The central issue in the case was whether a cartoon character could depict a real person.
Judge Michael Adams decided that it could, and found a man from Sydney guilty of possessing child pornography on his computer.
The defence had argued that the fictional, animated characters were not real people, and clearly departed from the human form.
They therefore contested that the conviction for the possession of child pornography should be overturned.
Justice Michael Adams said the purpose of anti-child pornography legislation was to stop sexual exploitation and child abuse where images of “real” children were depicted.
Taken from and read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7770781.stm
5 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
What drugs have this Judge Michael Adams been on, I question his professionalism for being a judge where their’s actually pedophila’s that should be procescuted and locked up instead of some sad little guy wanking over some simpson cartoon porno drawings that doesn’t involve any abuse of children, it’s pathetic.
Comment by Mark March 17, 2009 @ 6:54 amIt is Pathetic! Get a life, Judge Michael Adams !!!
Comment by F.F.B. March 17, 2009 @ 1:19 pmTESHUVAH!!!!
Comment by nark September 2, 2009 @ 6:13 pmwhat the fuck i think that that is child porn it looks and imatates child porn so don’t give me that crap if a sad guy wants to wank he can do it from a real girl on the net!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment by stefan October 17, 2009 @ 2:58 pmWell Marge is doing playboy, NO SHIT!!!
Comment by X Factor October 18, 2009 @ 2:29 pm